Many studies have concluded that young children are most affected by what they see on television Dritz, Russel 1996. However, many dispute the extent to which censorship should be put in place, arguing that censorship is a powerful weapon which can be abused by depraved individuals. It is like nuclear energy, which if used well, has great benefits for humanity, but there may be some, who might want to use it for the wrong reasons. The question is: how far would a government go to silence so many voices? Each society, culture, or individual's belief is violated by the codes of censorship that our society instills. As America has seen, a countless amount of people have been known to complain about on television. Music's verbal expression bonds our society through our emotions and experiences. As and Independent body it has no government funding and the government has no influence in its affairs.
No matter what, censorship should come with rationale. Censorship includes the examination and blocking of books, periodicals, plays, films, television and radio programs, news reports, and other communication media that is shown to, or available, to the public. As a result, the news is televised. To sum up, i think that although censorship is not entirely advantageous to the people, it is still imperative in protecting the interests of minors and maintaining order in a society. The way of producing news in programs in mass media are to satisfy a certain group of people in a not democratic way. Censorship is necessary to avoid offending certain people.
Con Well that's a whole different debate in itself since that deals with libel and the first amendment. In our society, large corporations are a more common source of censorship than governments: Media outlets killing stories because they undermine corporate interests; advertisers using their financial clout to kill negative reports; powerful businesses using the threat of expensive lawsuits to discourage legitimate investigations. There are also different types of censorship. Con Since my opponent forfeited the previous round I will restate my argument, Censorship is not necessary. I understand that like anything else they need to do what they can to stay in business, but isn't there a better way to go about doing things? Censorship can be defined as a control over an ideas or information circulated among people.
For a long time, art has been a way to express emotions, stories, a view of life, and so much more. . Children and young adults are those that are greatly affected by the media, and censorship is something that needs to be regularized before this audience. However, still more that believe in civil rights believe that it is an unnecessary violation of the right to freedom of speech for all humans. These protections - censorships- extend into all aspects of our lives.
Nowadays what is considered appropriate by many may actually be considered explicit or unsuitable by the people in charge. What if manipulating the media brings a resolution to a conflict. Media censorship needs to be exercised to a great extent, given the situation the world is in when it comes to such arenas. Communities need to monitor content for minors in television, on the internet, and in print media. Speaking for myself, I would like to know the whole story behind whatever is being covered, not just what someone else wants me to know.
In some parts of the world, the media are controlled by the government. They agree that they should receive a physical education for their bodies and an education in music and poetry for their souls. Of course on dora you can't swear because children watch it. To facilitate parent's exercise of viewing cens. Censorship should not be imposed on citizens by the government or other agencies; adults have a right to view or listen to what they choose. There is no actual reason it should be banned. Although I feel that there are many other justified reasons that media censorship is necessary such as protection of national security, banning graphic and illicit content, and dissuading political bias, there is an opposing view.
Simpson, or is it the American public's own fault for believing everything they hear? If you want to change the levels of censorship in our society--in other words, to benefit society by loosening or tightening censorship--the best approach is to appeal to the stated values of our institutions. We deserve to know what is happening, whether it hurts or not. Posting about any type of Human Right violation will get the poster into a lot of trouble. If we hold to ethical principles, such as truth and justice, we can encourage or demand censorship as needed. Some, on the other hand, claim that the news media are only interested in increasing their ratings and that they achieve this by reporting events that are of a violent and outrageous nature. Today there is much controversy over whether there should or shouldn't be censorship of the media.
In this case- are we really even safe? In ancient times, before the printing press and the mass production of literature, book burning was an effective form of censorship. The idea of accurate representations in the media, thus, is vital for any minority group, impacting on how the group is perceived and accepted by society. Usually music artists record two versions of the same song, one in its explicitness and the other in a clean format. Many people are in favor of censorship and it may be accomplished without violating the rights of broadcasters or any other individuals. Con I think there was a bit of misunderstanding, I wasn't saying one standard for all situations, I was explaining that for situations that are similar they can't allow exceptions to the rule. Instead of broadcasting the explicit version on cable television, an edited and censored version is shown instead.