Germans who accepted Nazi propaganda that Jews were genetically inferior to Aryans would also have been objective and scientific! We understand so little of gravity and really everything that to pretend we are even able to refer to external reality as objective seems a bit ridiculous to me when I think about it. Even if you take religion such as Chrisitianity there is no subjectivism about what the ten commandments express. No one could, except maybe the creator, but then who else could even understand what he were saying? That involves the study of psychology—not objectivity. We perceive this reality when our social realities line up with objective reality. Therefore these facts that have been proved to which becomes a very reliable source.
To the extent that this correspondence exists, beta reality is a conduit if not an entirely passive one for effects that originate in alpha reality. On the other hand, since people aren't very familiar with these concepts, you may end up spending more time explaining the basics than debating the higher-level issues. Yep, awareness is not important. Beliefs can be objectively true or false, but the critical point to be made about their role as the building blocks of subjective reality is that their objective truth status is irrelevant to their effects, per sociologist W. I want to make this point again as I did with others who use emotions to think: when you say all is subjective then your statement is absolute because you are making a universal claim! From this we can see a major difference which is simply that subjectivity changes all the time and that objectivity hardly ever changes if in fact never changes.
In several subjective viewpoints, all of these documented collaborative propositions paragraphs are so funny to listen too, when you realize…. Currently, I grant this hand s to type this answer on the keyboard. Thank you for clarifying that we agree that objectivity does not require people to define but I feel that the way you explained your analysis of the whole dream thing did not show much in terms of how we define any objective facts dream. To say there is no existing unicorn or pink fairies is to exhaust every physical possibility in the world to reach certainty. Art works are one-of-a-kind … items, materially worthless, which have in common that a price is asked for them.
As for the meteor, well in a sense it is objective and external in that it is a big rock-like thing heading for Earth and it will kill us. Our subjective experience is our reality. That does not address the issue. For most people, this is absolutely true: The body is physical matter that is born and hurts and dies. Has an angry tone and a shocking appearance and expresses itself in violent language. Even though I know what objectivity says.
It does not mean anything is true nor false. But those terms, those thoughts, are all filtered through our own subjective lenses and tainted for better or worse by our unique schooling histories and life experiences. Yes, everything is subjective including this one. In the realm of ontology, objective things are mind-independent and subjective things are mind-dependent. Is this an accurate interpretation of what you are trying to express Cheyenne? If you want to say anything about it, you have to focus on its specific characteristics.
As soon as you begin to thing about anything,to give it meaning it becomes subjective. Why do we need humans to prove that there anything to exist? Example-2: Objective Thinking: a goat sees a smoke, she doesnot ran out, when she sees fire and feel heat then she ran out. In the course of a normal day, we are faced with hundreds of mostly routine choices that are based on theories — beliefs — about the world. Vygotsky's sociohistorical psychology and its contemporary applications. Human beings are to be rational —not resort to beast like behavior.
This distinction is important for studying social action. For any response I give to you will be necessarily a second-hand report, which you would still need to verify by your own personal experience, which would necessarily be different from my own experience. So, subjective thinking has its merits. So our personal realities, our subjective views, are almost tragically, hopelessly untrue. Commodities are identical units of sure value—bushels of wheat, say—whose price fluctuates from time to time and place to place. We cannot speak without representing. Being human also means knowing how we are related to other realms.
That is if the premises are in fact true and literally meaningful there is no way to refuse the conclusion— well that is if you are rational. You should be objective whenever you are discussing an object, something concrete that you can hold or touch. If you look it up, when we dream, we have brain activity, which that there is a scientific facts about dreams which are not necessarily subjective. Every word and each of the definitions for those words was placed by the opinion of the person or group of people that wanted that specific word to be described by whatever definition they have subjectively chosen for it to mean. That is where my claim and method is different than the science lover who loves debating.