Although, if an animal in the pack betrays the pack there is no second chances. Of these four, the ethics of care theory is the strongest and most readily relatable to the profession of psychiatry and nursing while the three aforementioned ones are not. It is based on different virtues that a person should have, so that they can then reach Euadamonia. First, virtue ethics is really complicated and multiple varieties of the theory of virtue ethics exist. The common thread running through these explanations is that the virtue in all cases consists in the mean between two extremes. Moral goodness, it suggests, is primarily a matter of character, rather than of action.
Society toady is far too big and complex to take note of a moral theory that only focuses on the small things. Consequentialist is the wrong way to go. However, through this Strength Finder course I have found a new and much more empowering perspective of this word strength. The moral logic an association uses to lead business can influence the reputation, profitability and main concern of the business. If a person has many parts, so to speak, he or she will be able to develop these components and grow in character. Virtue ethics is not so much interested in the question 'What should I do? Furthermore, I will explain my moral philosophy and its strength and weaknesses and how I will… 920 Words 4 Pages Virtues he tells us are like diverse judgments of excellence or admirableness and you cannot reduce to a single principle explanation of what it is excellent.
Why would it be good for the person to have such traits? It instead focuses on whether the individual performing that particular action is expressing good traits or not. Have you ever been in a situation where something seemed morally fuzzy? Even then, the ethical theories have found a problem that were set by the sophists, who noticed that the ethical attitudes vary from person to person and from nation to nation. Utilitarian ethics leave room for occasional lying, under the assumption that sometimes lies actually serve the common good. It is an excellent basis for my revision. It stresses that the theory isn't rigid, but in fact flexible and situation-sensitive.
Aristotle and David Hume developed accounts of ethics that remained true to their own empirical philosophies; both of which stray away from the more traditional accounts. A detailed account of virtue ethics such as Aristotle's work would provide an in depth analysis of the virtues and their extreme vices. But, given our common nature as human beings it also should not come as a surprise that many of the virtues are universally important. The virtues are whatever character traits enable us to live at the heights of excellence. Emotions could get in the way with what is truly right or wrong- stealing is always going to be wrong, even if you steal because your family is starving- it does not detract from the act being The Golden Mean: The Four Cardinal Virtues: This is the middle ground between two extremes. These theories assist nurses with identifying potential problems and developing skills required to determine and justify decisions in given situations. But this answer, only returns the virtue theorist to the very rule-based theories he tried to resist earlier.
Or, we might put it this way: how are we to determine just what the virtues are? But, there's also such a thing as too much courage and this too is a vice; the vice of foolhardiness. Equity is based on fairness to others, pragmatism, respect for diversity and equal advantage for all, among many other areas. First, the utilitarianism is moral standard and a theory of action by humans that are morally right in action. If you are still unsure about how to proceed with the discussion, please reply to one of those announcements or contact your instructor. The theory considers these characteristics rather than the consequences of an action. When discussing the ethical and moral reasoning behind the racial divide of incarceration rates, virtue ethics requires us to evaluate the morality of the person doing a given act, rather than the act itself Dreisbach, 2013. A virtue is a mean state which lays between two vices.
These aspects lead to differences on what is morally right or wrong for people. The two topics are similar but they also have a difference separate the two. When applied to a situation these frameworks help teachers to resolve and justify their decision making. Thus, it is hard to identify these virtues. What should happen When making decisions, especially critical ones, one can never be certain of the outcome to follow. According to theologian James Keenan, justice makes it imperative for a man to treat others equally and impartially while bravery or fortitude makes it possible for a person to aim for self-care of protecting oneself. Elizabeth Anscombe argued that the concept of moral duty rests on theological background assumptions.
However, there are four cardinal virtues included in the traditional list. We also need to know character traits of the virtue. This subjective outgrowth of moral concepts allows for change from society to society. Plato discusses wisdom, fortitude, justice, and temperance as the cardinal virtues Cline, 2017. Talk of moral duty no longer makes any sense.
One important factor in the revival of virtue ethics has been a growing dissatisfaction with rule-based systems of ethics. As different as they are, social contract theory, deontology, and utilitarianism are similar in their emphasis on ethical principles as a guide to conduct. Therefore we are made into a better person because of our better decision making. In the first place, they have understood the need to distinguish good people from legalists. Improving our character to be a more virtuous person can be done by following the.
If we asked the virtue ethicist, he would say to live in accordance with the virtues. Then he thought virtue ethics is acquired by established tradition, culture, in other words he thought relativism is part of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics establishes the appropriateness and inappropriateness of actions of individuals by relating the choice to admirable character traits. Many argue over the merits of various theories, each with its own philosophies and assumptions. Each type of theory has been extensively argued, yet no one approach is definitive. Consider how you look at yourself. Moral reasoning, arguably, could be what is 'supposed' to help overcome ethical conflicts, but what if one's reasoning is flawed or immoral? We can also provide a more detailed account for each virtue of why it is important as Rachels does in this section.